Is it yet another example of bitter partisan bias against Republicans in the public eye, or a responsible check on the power of social media influence in the United States?
That question is now one that Parler stakeholder and spokesman Dan Bongino will be made to answer before a Congressional panel next week investigating the possible monopolistic practices of his surging social media platform.
In the wake of the Presidential The during which Joe Biden claimed an obvious victory to become the 46th President of the United States, scores of delusional supporters of losing President Trump have flocked to the third-string substitute out of what medical experts call: “extreme butthurt” conditions. In a short time, Parler has managed to nearly quadruple its collective member IQ into the double digits.
But is it a “monopoly”? Harvard University Trumptard Professor Sandy Batt says it is and should be wholly investigated.
“If you are a mental hospital, and you have almost exclusively all of the patients in the world who think they’re Elvis Presley, you have a monopoly. It’s that simple.
These people could be getting alternative treatment and better care in other institutions, just the same as the mentally damaged collection of gullible dipshits on Parler listening to Mr. Bongino, a z-list Rush Limbaugh clone like dozens of others.
It’s unhealthy to run from Facebook just because they’re taking responsibility for not feeding you Trump nonsense anymore. If these easily-led simpletons had any faith, they could stand and make their case. Couldn’t they?”
Although having a monopoly on pipe-dreaming conspiracy-swallowing nincompoops like trumpers is akin to owning the majority of Earth’s most scratched-up Nickleback CD’s, it still may be breaking the monopoly laws.
Will Bongino be made to answer for his platform’s intentional collecting of insipid morons? One way or the other, you’ll probably have to find out on Facebook.
