Site icon Dunning-Kruger-Times.com

US Taxpayers Pitched In $1.7 Million for Chelsea’s Wedding, 7 Years After The Clintons Left the White House

In what experts are calling the most egregious misuse of taxpayer funds since the government spent $300,000 studying shrimp on treadmills, newly uncovered documents reveal that American taxpayers unwittingly contributed a staggering $1.7 million to Chelsea Clinton’s wedding—despite the Clintons having left the White House seven years earlier.

The expenses, which included everything from gold-plated napkins to a synchronized dolphin ballet, have sent conservative watchdog groups into an absolute frenzy. “This is an outrageous abuse of government money,” declared Senator Joe Barron, who reportedly had no problem approving a $4 million grant for a research project titled “Do Ducks Like Jazz?” “The American people deserve answers—like, why was $250,000 spent on a team of private butlers whose only job was to hold umbrellas over the guests?”

Among the most baffling expenses found in the documents:

While records do not indicate exactly how taxpayer money was funneled into the wedding, some speculate that it was buried deep inside a spending bill labeled “Miscellaneous Patriotism Enhancements.” Meanwhile, critics argue that if anything, the Clintons should have covered the cost themselves, given that Bill and Hillary have a combined net worth that could probably purchase a small European country.

For her part, Chelsea Clinton has denied knowing that taxpayer funds were used. “I just thought it was normal for weddings to have a $40,000 imported fog machine to create a mystical ambiance for the first dance,” she explained.

Despite widespread outrage, some Washington insiders have defended the spending. “Compared to some government waste, this is nothing,” said one anonymous staffer. “I mean, we once spent $2 million on a Pentagon-approved study about whether cats could be trained to deliver messages. Spoiler alert: They can’t.”

With the scandal now in the public eye, the American people are left wondering—if this was taxpayer-funded, what else have they unknowingly paid for? And more importantly, how do they get invited to the next taxpayer-funded luxury event?

Exit mobile version